Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Adicionar filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano
1.
Science ; 380(6649): 1059-1064, 2023 Jun 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20243994

RESUMO

COVID-19 lockdowns in early 2020 reduced human mobility, providing an opportunity to disentangle its effects on animals from those of landscape modifications. Using GPS data, we compared movements and road avoidance of 2300 terrestrial mammals (43 species) during the lockdowns to the same period in 2019. Individual responses were variable with no change in average movements or road avoidance behavior, likely due to variable lockdown conditions. However, under strict lockdowns 10-day 95th percentile displacements increased by 73%, suggesting increased landscape permeability. Animals' 1-hour 95th percentile displacements declined by 12% and animals were 36% closer to roads in areas of high human footprint, indicating reduced avoidance during lockdowns. Overall, lockdowns rapidly altered some spatial behaviors, highlighting variable but substantial impacts of human mobility on wildlife worldwide.


Assuntos
Migração Animal , Animais Selvagens , COVID-19 , Mamíferos , Quarentena , Animais , Humanos , Animais Selvagens/fisiologia , Animais Selvagens/psicologia , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Mamíferos/fisiologia , Mamíferos/psicologia , Movimento
2.
Future Oncol ; 17(27): 3615-3625, 2021 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1317191

RESUMO

Aim: Patient and worker satisfaction at an oncologic hub during the COVID-19 pandemic has never been reported. We addressed this topic. Methods: We conducted a survey to test the views of patients (n = 64) and healthcare professionals (n = 52) involved with our operative protocol. Results: A moderate/severe grade of concern due to the COVID-19 emergency was recorded in 63% of patients versus 75% of hospital staff. High/very high versus low satisfaction grade about preventive strategies to reduce the risk of SARS-CoV-2 contagion was identified in the patients compared with the hospital staff group. Conclusion: Surgical treatment at a hub center of uro-oncologic patients coming from spoke centers is well accepted and should, therefore, be recommended. Preventive strategies to reduce the risk of SARS-CoV-2 contagion in hospital staff members should be implemented.


Lay abstract We provide robust evidence that an oncologic hub center during COVID-19 pandemic represents a credible solution for management of non-deferrable uro-oncologic patients. Specifically, surgical treatment at a hub center of patients coming from spoke centers is well accepted by both patients and hospital staff members. Moreover, collaboration between healthcare workers from spoke and hub centers generates minimal levels of anxiety, while potentially being associated with clinical, surgical and scientific improvement. This said, a more specific focus on recommended strategies to reduce the risk of SARS-CoV-2 contagion at oncologic hub hospitals is warranted.


Assuntos
Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , COVID-19 , Satisfação do Paciente , Neoplasias Urológicas/cirurgia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/psicologia , Humanos , Itália , Satisfação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Equipamento de Proteção Individual , Estudos Retrospectivos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Neoplasias Urológicas/psicologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA